Triple
T33687745
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tangere |
E863086
|
entity |
| Predicate | constructionInPhraseNoliMeTangere |
P192728
|
FINISHED |
| Object | prohibitive with noli plus infinitive |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: prohibitive with noli plus infinitive | Statement: [Tangere, constructionInPhraseNoliMeTangere, prohibitive with noli plus infinitive]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constructionInPhraseNoliMeTangere Context triple: [Tangere, constructionInPhraseNoliMeTangere, prohibitive with noli plus infinitive]
-
A.
moodInPhraseNoliMeTangere
Indicates that a particular mood (e.g., indicative, imperative, subjunctive) is expressed within the phrase "Noli Me Tangere."
-
B.
constructs
Indicates that an agent builds, creates, or assembles something, typically resulting in a new or more complex entity or structure.
-
C.
symbolicPhrase
Indicates a relationship where one entity is represented or expressed by a symbolic phrase associated with another entity.
-
D.
construes
Indicates how one entity interprets, understands, or mentally represents another entity or situation.
-
E.
combinedConstruction
Indicates that multiple construction elements, processes, or projects are joined or executed together as a single combined construction activity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498662b48190904442c39df84fb7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd2839880c819099a7a89783f2270e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd23dc5da48190ae8ba08947d34956 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd28379d2c8190903ba228ee1cc756 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:43 a.m.