Triple

T33434761
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gamepad API E856214 entity
Predicate securityModelIncludes P188911 FINISHED
Object same-origin policy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: same-origin policy | Statement: [Gamepad API, securityModelIncludes, same-origin policy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityModelIncludes
Context triple: [Gamepad API, securityModelIncludes, same-origin policy]
  • A. securityModelIdentifier
    Indicates the specific security model or framework under which an entity, interaction, or policy is defined or governed.
  • B. securityModelAbbreviation
    Indicates that one entity is the standard or commonly used abbreviated form of the name or identifier of a particular security model.
  • C. securityModelSimilarTo
    Indicates that one entity’s security model is similar or comparable to that of another entity.
  • D. securityPracticeIncludes
    Indicates that a broader security practice encompasses, contains, or makes use of a specific security measure, control, or activity.
  • E. securityLevelsInclude
    Indicates that one entity’s defined security levels contain or encompass the security levels of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349709e7881908c342b4d34f555f4 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbaf18085481908c774e8f8bbb9a41 completed May 6, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbadf1e6008190a71bbd196ba06844 completed May 6, 2026, 9:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fbaebbb7f88190b4edfd9b83550aad completed May 6, 2026, 9:12 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:36 a.m.