Triple
T33280926
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | O’Connor Method |
E852041
|
entity |
| Predicate | emphasizesMusicalStyle |
P22764
|
FINISHED |
| Object | American folk music |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: American folk music | Statement: [O’Connor Method, emphasizesMusicalStyle, American folk music]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: emphasizesMusicalStyle Context triple: [O’Connor Method, emphasizesMusicalStyle, American folk music]
-
A.
hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic
Indicates that something possesses or exhibits a particular musical style as a defining characteristic.
-
B.
musicalStyleRequirement
Indicates that a specific musical style is required or prescribed for a given entity, context, or performance.
-
C.
includesMusicalStyle
chosen
Indicates that one entity encompasses, features, or incorporates a particular musical style as part of its content or character.
-
D.
styleOfMusic
Indicates the musical genre or stylistic category that characterizes a piece of music, artist, or performance.
-
E.
playsInStyleOf
Indicates that one entity performs, creates, or behaves in a manner characteristic of another entity’s style.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349653da08190819876015a298fdb |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e02ba6b881908dfafc52d3b75f1c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6de09c2f481909f8b2545d3208c9f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:32 a.m.