Triple

T33205604
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject NADPH E850008 entity
Predicate isConjugateWith P65691 FINISHED
Object NADP+ LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: NADP+ | Statement: [NADPH, isConjugateWith, NADP+]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isConjugateWith
Context triple: [NADPH, isConjugateWith, NADP+]
  • A. hasConjugateConcept
    Indicates that one concept is the conjugate (e.g., complex, algebraic, or structurally dual counterpart) of another concept within a given formal system.
  • B. isConjugatedTo
    Indicates that two verb forms are related as different inflectional variants of the same verb through conjugation.
  • C. conjugateTo
    Indicates that one entity can be transformed into the other by a specific equivalence operation (such as similarity or group conjugation), so they are equivalent up to that transformation.
  • D. isInverseOf
    Indicates that one relation reverses the direction of another, so that if the original relates A to B, its inverse relates B to A.
  • E. conjugacyProperty chosen
    Indicates that two elements or structures are related by conjugation, sharing the same form up to an inner automorphism or similarity transformation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3495fb92c819083ce65d0ddee7a76 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7465687bc8190a9da44d62b634ed7 completed May 3, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f743f4ceb08190a21fe7f4a99b166b completed May 3, 2026, 12:47 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:30 a.m.