Triple
T32607242
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nash equilibrium |
E833553
|
entity |
| Predicate | guaranteedExistenceIn |
P9000
|
FINISHED |
| Object | finite games with mixed strategies |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: finite games with mixed strategies | Statement: [Nash equilibrium, guaranteedExistenceIn, finite games with mixed strategies]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: guaranteedExistenceIn Context triple: [Nash equilibrium, guaranteedExistenceIn, finite games with mixed strategies]
-
A.
existsFor
chosen
Indicates that something is present, available, or holds true for a particular entity, context, or condition.
-
B.
existsAs
Indicates that one entity has the same identity or manifestation as another, effectively asserting they are the same existing thing or state.
-
C.
existsFrom
Indicates that an entity comes into existence or begins to be valid starting from a specified point in time or condition.
-
D.
existsIf
Indicates that the existence or validity of one entity or condition depends on the presence or truth of another specified condition.
-
E.
guaranteedFor
Indicates that one entity provides an assurance or warranty that remains valid for another entity over a specified period or under certain conditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3492bfa648190b6ae472074634e29 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c6c80a388190b038cfe32c2f2ca4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6bd2c138481908afa3ee3e91f8900 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:05 a.m.