Triple
T3252557
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Geʽez |
E68214
|
entity |
| Predicate | influenced |
P9
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gurage languages |
E87295
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gurage languages | Statement: [Geʽez, influenced, Gurage languages]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gurage languages Context triple: [Geʽez, influenced, Gurage languages]
-
A.
Gurage languages
chosen
The Gurage languages are a group of closely related South Ethiosemitic languages spoken primarily by the Gurage people in central and southwestern Ethiopia.
-
B.
Omotik–Datooga languages
The Omotik–Datooga languages are a small subgroup of Southern Nilotic languages spoken by pastoralist communities in parts of Kenya and Tanzania.
-
C.
Afar language
The Afar language is a Cushitic language spoken primarily by the Afar people in Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Djibouti.
-
D.
Badaga language
Badaga language is a Southern Dravidian language spoken primarily by the Badaga community in the Nilgiri Hills of Tamil Nadu, India.
-
E.
Gumuz languages
Gumuz languages are a small group of closely related, under-documented languages spoken primarily by the Gumuz people in parts of Ethiopia and Sudan.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad858f74408190bcbd07f967cd7bd0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adaf440bb88190a2450405afae7f1f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:17 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b2776e9ad88190a59edf4735703e8d |
completed | March 12, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:09 p.m.