Triple

T321323
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Archaea E6420 entity
Predicate recognizedAsDomain P11984 FINISHED
Object late 1970s LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: late 1970s | Statement: [Archaea, recognizedAsDomain, late 1970s]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recognizedAsDomain
Context triple: [Archaea, recognizedAsDomain, late 1970s]
  • A. recognizedAs
    Indicates that one entity is acknowledged or accepted as having the identity, role, status, or classification of another entity.
  • B. recognizedFor
    Indicates that one entity is acknowledged, credited, or honored for a particular achievement, quality, contribution, or work associated with another entity.
  • C. recognizedIn
    Indicates that an entity is formally acknowledged, honored, or given recognition within a particular context, setting, or domain.
  • D. usedInDomain
    Indicates that something (such as a concept, method, or resource) is applied or utilized within a particular domain or field.
  • E. regulatoryDomain
    Indicates that one entity defines or governs the rules, policies, or constraints under which another entity must operate.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7933d6c8190bb2592ad13286ef2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea81a1e88190b3496070eb3d85f5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e948048c819098ba4de9261ef2ef completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ea08878c8190a5e8a90f620a3888 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.