Triple
T32092447
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | MIPS R2000 |
E819631
|
entity |
| Predicate | coprocessorInterfaceCount |
P173528
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 4 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4 | Statement: [MIPS R2000, coprocessorInterfaceCount, 4]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coprocessorInterfaceCount Context triple: [MIPS R2000, coprocessorInterfaceCount, 4]
-
A.
coprocessorNumber
Indicates the identifying number assigned to a specific coprocessor associated with a processor or system.
-
B.
coprocessorInterface
Indicates a relationship where one component provides or uses an interface to coordinate operations with a coprocessor.
-
C.
coprocessorModel
Indicates that one entity is the specific model designation of a coprocessor associated with another entity.
-
D.
numericCoprocessorSupport
Indicates that a system or processor includes and can utilize a dedicated numeric coprocessor for performing arithmetic or mathematical operations.
-
E.
separateCoprocessorModels
Indicates that distinct models or representations are maintained for coprocessors, rather than sharing or combining them with other processing components.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349004b2481908ce2e50af0d579a8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b63edd4c819093b664b38a69d7c8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b3a7bdb481908d16a32f49e38c2c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6b49339048190b617a6749f648825 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.