Triple

T32073444
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Force de frappe E819077 entity
Predicate hasFormerComponent P193318 FINISHED
Object French land-based nuclear forces LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: French land-based nuclear forces | Statement: [Force de frappe, hasFormerComponent, French land-based nuclear forces]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFormerComponent
Context triple: [Force de frappe, hasFormerComponent, French land-based nuclear forces]
  • A. hasFormerParent
    Indicates that an entity was previously the parent of another entity but no longer holds that parental role or status.
  • B. hasFormerEntity
    Indicates that one entity previously existed in a different form, role, or identity that is represented by another entity.
  • C. hasFormerType
    Indicates that an entity previously had a certain type or classification that has since changed.
  • D. hasFormerEvent
    Indicates that an entity was preceded by a specific earlier event in its history or sequence.
  • E. hasFormerSection chosen
    Indicates that an entity previously contained another entity as a section or subdivision, but no longer does so in its current structure.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348fecc088190af1470afe5a969f0 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd553d7cb881908d243e7a9f30ac85 completed May 8, 2026, 3:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd514dcb1c81908333c70d7edd79c9 completed May 8, 2026, 2:58 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:23 a.m.