Triple

T3201359
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida E67058 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division E67057 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division | Statement: [Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida, relatedCase, Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
Context triple: [Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida, relatedCase, Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division]
  • A. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division chosen
    Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied strict scrutiny to a denial of unemployment benefits based on an individual’s religiously motivated refusal to perform certain work, reinforcing robust protections for free exercise of religion.
  • B. Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security
    Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could not deny unemployment benefits to a worker who refused Sunday work for sincere religious reasons, even though he was not a member of an organized religion.
  • C. Timbs v. Indiana
    Timbs v. Indiana is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • D. Hess v. Indiana
    Hess v. Indiana is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of the First Amendment's "incitement" exception by holding that an antiwar protester's vulgar statement advocating future lawless action was protected speech.
  • E. Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida
    Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state may not deny unemployment benefits to a worker who is fired for refusing, on newly adopted religious grounds, to work on her Sabbath.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8589bd988190afa7ed2bdffb7b33 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ada9aedef08190824bdf508f85f06f completed March 8, 2026, 4:54 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b2621d3bcc8190abf84310bc118757 completed March 12, 2026, 6:50 a.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:07 p.m.