Triple
T30844560
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Helianthus tuberosus |
E785598
|
entity |
| Predicate | dietaryUse |
P25824
|
FINISHED |
| Object | low-glycemic food |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: low-glycemic food | Statement: [Helianthus tuberosus, dietaryUse, low-glycemic food]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dietaryUse Context triple: [Helianthus tuberosus, dietaryUse, low-glycemic food]
-
A.
culinaryUse
chosen
Indicates that one entity is used in the preparation, flavoring, or serving of food or drink for another entity.
-
B.
dietaryConsideration
Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies nutritional restrictions, preferences, or requirements that should be taken into account for another entity.
-
C.
dietEvidence
Indicates that there is supporting information or documentation about an entity’s diet or dietary habits.
-
D.
dietAdvocated
Indicates that one entity promotes, recommends, or supports a particular diet for another entity or audience.
-
E.
dietaryOptions
Indicates the types of diets or food-related preferences, restrictions, or choices that are applicable to or offered for an entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b850848190a4af4ccf8ddadcdf |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69145041c81909275df4e885f090a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:05 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f68b7d2794819092fef8a63f4f3de8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:46 p.m.