Triple

T30337967
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Chess960 E771671 entity
Predicate tacticalComplexity P168862 FINISHED
Object high LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [Chess960, tacticalComplexity, high]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tacticalComplexity
Context triple: [Chess960, tacticalComplexity, high]
  • A. tacticalStyle
    Indicates the characteristic way in which an entity plans and executes actions or maneuvers to achieve its objectives.
  • B. tacticalIssue
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is involved in, affected by, or characterized as a specific tactical problem, challenge, or concern within an operational context.
  • C. tacticalSystem
    Indicates a relationship where an entity functions as or is associated with a tactical system used for planning, coordinating, or executing tactical operations.
  • D. tacticalPurpose
    Indicates the specific tactical objective or intended operational role that an action, asset, or decision is meant to achieve within a broader plan or mission.
  • E. tacticalFeatureUsed
    Indicates that a specific tactical feature, maneuver, or capability is employed or brought into play within a tactical situation or operation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2248aba24819095bb86480d55b23b completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f681ce34048190b4d31e2966949d8c completed May 2, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f67603526c81908295a1ece8727c66 completed May 2, 2026, 10:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f676f73c3481909f01fa69851b7298 completed May 2, 2026, 10:13 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:54 p.m.