Triple
T2987954
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Korematsu v. United States (dissent) |
E80672
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewsMilitaryJudgmentsAs |
P2282
|
FINISHED |
| Object | subject to judicial review |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subject to judicial review | Statement: [Korematsu v. United States (dissent), viewsMilitaryJudgmentsAs, subject to judicial review]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewsMilitaryJudgmentsAs Context triple: [Korematsu v. United States (dissent), viewsMilitaryJudgmentsAs, subject to judicial review]
-
A.
viewsMilitaryAs
Indicates that one entity holds a particular perception, attitude, or evaluative stance toward the military as an institution or concept.
-
B.
judgmentInvolves
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
C.
bindingNatureOfJudgments
chosen
Indicates that judgments or decisions have a compulsory, legally enforceable effect on the parties or entities to which they apply.
-
D.
judicialArticle
Indicates that there is a specific legal or judicial article that governs, defines, or is applied to the relationship or action between the entities.
-
E.
judgeFrom
Indicates that one entity forms an opinion, evaluation, or conclusion about something based on another specified source, basis, or perspective.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b16c3488190b47b6aa7a59a335b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad99c9cdd081908fa8094a3ac1f8d3 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad961403108190bbecb8d3608fd4e0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:59 p.m.