Triple
T29852546
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Asgard archaea |
E758100
|
entity |
| Predicate | areThoughtToHave |
P159732
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mixotrophic lifestyles |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mixotrophic lifestyles | Statement: [Asgard archaea, areThoughtToHave, mixotrophic lifestyles]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areThoughtToHave Context triple: [Asgard archaea, areThoughtToHave, mixotrophic lifestyles]
-
A.
believedToHave
chosen
Indicates that one entity is thought or assumed, but not confirmed, to possess or exhibit another entity or property.
-
B.
canBeThoughtBy
Indicates that something is capable of being conceived, imagined, or mentally represented by a thinking entity.
-
C.
believedTo
Indicates that one entity holds a belief or conviction about the truth, existence, or properties of another entity or proposition.
-
D.
considered
Indicates that one entity regards, judges, or thinks about another entity in a particular way or context.
-
E.
alsoConsidered
Indicates that one item is regarded as an alternative or additional option alongside another in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2245a82cc8190a387e7d0118d710b |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67648f35c8190ab466e413b6dbcb5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66ac32b60819092290b2de35988d3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:44 p.m.