Triple
T298241
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | forty-niners |
E6139
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableImpact |
P477
|
FINISHED |
| Object | accelerated California statehood |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: accelerated California statehood | Statement: [forty-niners, notableImpact, accelerated California statehood]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableImpact Context triple: [forty-niners, notableImpact, accelerated California statehood]
-
A.
notableContribution
chosen
Indicates that an entity has made a significant, recognized contribution to another entity, field, work, or endeavor.
-
B.
notableFor
Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
-
C.
notableDuring
Indicates that something was especially prominent, active, or significant during a particular time period or event.
-
D.
notableSingle
Indicates that the subject is particularly recognized or distinguished for one specific, individual instance (such as a single work, event, or achievement).
-
E.
notableCategory
Indicates that an entity is recognized as notable or significant within a particular category or classification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79114b081909490b3bf5a5dbb51 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea4778cc8190be7b648a82542891 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e937af888190a0960708f09ae033 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.