Triple
T29375860
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1973 Constitution of the Philippines |
E744995
|
entity |
| Predicate | ratificationControversy |
P1783
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Questions on validity of plebiscite |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Questions on validity of plebiscite | Statement: [1973 Constitution of the Philippines, ratificationControversy, Questions on validity of plebiscite]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ratificationControversy Context triple: [1973 Constitution of the Philippines, ratificationControversy, Questions on validity of plebiscite]
-
A.
ratificationVote
Indicates a formal vote taken to approve, confirm, or give official sanction to a decision, agreement, or action.
-
B.
ratificationOutcome
Indicates the result or status that follows from a formal ratification decision or process.
-
C.
ratificationPower
Indicates the authority or capacity of an entity to formally approve, confirm, or validate an agreement, decision, or action.
-
D.
ratificationMethod
Indicates the process or formal procedure by which an agreement, decision, or document is officially approved and made valid.
-
E.
controversy
chosen
Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0a79ba954819094597628112c6091 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f669adca6c81909efccc10634f9a63 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f660f4f7a88190b93c60d76b86c912 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:31 p.m.