Triple
T29341311
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GrimE |
E744043
|
entity |
| Predicate | developerStudioType |
P119812
|
FINISHED |
| Object | video game developer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: video game developer | Statement: [GrimE, developerStudioType, video game developer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developerStudioType Context triple: [GrimE, developerStudioType, video game developer]
-
A.
developerStudio
Indicates that a software developer or development team is associated with, works at, or uses a particular development studio or integrated development environment (IDE).
-
B.
developedWith
Indicates that something was created, built, or produced using a specified tool, technology, method, or collaborator.
-
C.
platformDeveloper
Indicates that one entity is the developer or creator responsible for building or maintaining the other entity as a platform.
-
D.
hasDeveloperType
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific category or type of developer.
-
E.
developerRenamedTo
Indicates that a developer previously known by one name is now identified by a new name.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f09126cfcc8190899b16fbf3c2bf7b |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71f8ee0688190bd025f27993452d3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71cc405c08190863565609a4c8499 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:34 p.m.