Triple

T28583175
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MPEG-1 Audio Layer III E723429 entity
Predicate compressionRatioTypical P12420 FINISHED
Object about 1:10 compared to uncompressed PCM LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: about 1:10 compared to uncompressed PCM | Statement: [MPEG-1 Audio Layer III, compressionRatioTypical, about 1:10 compared to uncompressed PCM]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compressionRatioTypical
Context triple: [MPEG-1 Audio Layer III, compressionRatioTypical, about 1:10 compared to uncompressed PCM]
  • A. compressionRatio chosen
    Indicates the proportional reduction in size or volume achieved when something is compressed compared to its original size.
  • B. compressionType
    Indicates the method or format used to compress data or content in the relationship.
  • C. compressionCharacteristic
    Indicates how an entity behaves or performs when subjected to compressive forces or pressure.
  • D. compressionMode
    Indicates the specific method or setting used to compress data or content in a given context.
  • E. compressionLoss
    Indicates that some amount of information, quality, or fidelity is lost as a result of a compression process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d7f92e481909847f5f3f3174a89 completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f652a492108190b885b955ce147d3c completed May 2, 2026, 7:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f651aad92c8190b874b3b5f9f64434 completed May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:16 a.m.