Triple

T28576375
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hyde Amendment E723250 entity
Predicate Harris v. McRaeHolding P153537 FINISHED
Object upheld constitutionality of federal abortion funding restrictions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: upheld constitutionality of federal abortion funding restrictions | Statement: [Hyde Amendment, Harris v. McRaeHolding, upheld constitutionality of federal abortion funding restrictions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: Harris v. McRaeHolding
Context triple: [Hyde Amendment, Harris v. McRaeHolding, upheld constitutionality of federal abortion funding restrictions]
  • A. seventhCircuitHolding
    Indicates that a legal decision or ruling was issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
  • B. SupremeCourtHoldingRelatedTo chosen
    Indicates that there is a connection between a Supreme Court holding and another legal element, such as a case, issue, statute, or principle, to which that holding specifically relates.
  • C. doctrineHeld
    Indicates that an agent adheres to, supports, or maintains a particular doctrine or set of principles.
  • D. holdsHuck
    Indicates that one entity is physically holding or carrying Huck.
  • E. constitutionalBasisOfHolding
    Indicates that one legal holding is grounded in, justified by, or derived from a specific constitutional provision or principle.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d7e97708190ae9e77ee66a68abd completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f650c7d5ac81908b1764972e438168 completed May 2, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f64cb0d8008190912e1430cfaf92aa completed May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:12 a.m.