Triple
T28516410
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Innovator's Dilemma |
E721629
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableEndorsementBy |
P146142
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Steve Jobs |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Steve Jobs | Statement: [The Innovator's Dilemma, notableEndorsementBy, Steve Jobs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableEndorsementBy Context triple: [The Innovator's Dilemma, notableEndorsementBy, Steve Jobs]
-
A.
notableEndorsement
Indicates that one entity has publicly and significantly endorsed, supported, or recommended another entity.
-
B.
holderNotableFor
Indicates that a holder (such as a person or organization) is particularly known or recognized for a specific role, achievement, work, or characteristic.
-
C.
hasNotableEndorsement
chosen
Indicates that an entity is publicly supported or recommended by a notable or influential individual, organization, or group.
-
D.
notableHolderAwardedTo
Indicates that a notable award or honor has been conferred upon a particular recipient.
-
E.
notableAwardRecognition
Indicates that an entity has received or been formally recognized with a notable award or honor.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01a5cbcc4819083fb4e723378713e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a01289f781481908f3788f8a719f2f4 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 12:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a012823c7248190961e20be48dd6246 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:17 a.m.