Triple

T28211290
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Malta STV elections E711175 entity
Predicate countingProcess P196000 FINISHED
Object iterative counting and transfer of preferences LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: iterative counting and transfer of preferences | Statement: [Malta STV elections, countingProcess, iterative counting and transfer of preferences]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: countingProcess
Context triple: [Malta STV elections, countingProcess, iterative counting and transfer of preferences]
  • A. hasCountingProcessNotation
    Indicates that a counting process is represented or expressed using a specific formal notation.
  • B. numberOfCounts
    Indicates the total quantity or tally of discrete occurrences, items, or instances associated with an entity or event.
  • C. count
    Indicates the numerical quantity or total number of instances of a specified entity or event.
  • D. areCountedBy
    Indicates that one entity serves as the counting mechanism, record, or process by which the quantity of another entity is determined.
  • E. countingProblem
    Indicates a situation where the task is to determine the number of possible outcomes, arrangements, or selections that satisfy given conditions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efb51cb5288190818c1f63a266af11 completed April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe00dad1708190b6522476bebb43af completed May 8, 2026, 3:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdfc3717f48190bb50ac2919c8ef95 completed May 8, 2026, 3:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe00d8d8248190a63c12aa2c2f7c0c completed May 8, 2026, 3:27 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:39 p.m.