Triple

T2819025
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nouvelle Edition de Genève 1979 E54361 entity
Predicate textualCharacter P39686 FINISHED
Object conservative language revision LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conservative language revision | Statement: [Nouvelle Edition de Genève 1979, textualCharacter, conservative language revision]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: textualCharacter
Context triple: [Nouvelle Edition de Genève 1979, textualCharacter, conservative language revision]
  • A. textCharacter chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a character (such as a letter, digit, or symbol) within a piece of text associated with another entity.
  • B. character2
    Indicates that a second character entity is involved in the relationship or context defined by the predicate.
  • C. character1
    Indicates that the subject is identified as the first or primary character in a narrative or context.
  • D. characterAddressed
    Indicates that one character directs speech, communication, or attention specifically toward another character.
  • E. characterIn
    Indicates that an entity appears as a character within a specified work, story, or narrative.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab49de0af08190b3da69683be1e728 completed March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abdf15b7288190a03d1193cc0544a6 completed March 7, 2026, 8:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abdd08f2f481908c3da8a9c7a00552 completed March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:59 p.m.