Triple
T27735658
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SpinLock |
E697521
|
entity |
| Predicate | synchronizationStyle |
P161327
|
FINISHED |
| Object | spinning |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: spinning | Statement: [SpinLock, synchronizationStyle, spinning]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: synchronizationStyle Context triple: [SpinLock, synchronizationStyle, spinning]
-
A.
synchronizationType
chosen
Indicates the specific manner or mode in which two or more processes, systems, or events are coordinated to operate in temporal or state alignment.
-
B.
synchronizationRole
Indicates the specific function or responsibility an entity has within a synchronization process or coordination relationship with other entities.
-
C.
synchronizationDirection
Indicates the direction in which data or state is synchronized between related entities (e.g., one-way or bidirectional).
-
D.
synchronizationTrigger
Indicates that one process, event, or condition initiates or controls the timing of another so they occur in a coordinated or synchronized manner.
-
E.
synchronizesWith
Indicates that two or more entities coordinate their states or activities so that they occur in step or remain temporally consistent with each other.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590c3e288190ad54d2465af8ca4e |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f643ed0b7481908cf25f3afec0a61d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641dc8ff48190ab575d855616580c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:12 p.m.