Triple
T27698858
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hesperornis |
E698371
|
entity |
| Predicate | wingCapability |
P3594
|
FINISHED |
| Object | incapable of powered flight |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: incapable of powered flight | Statement: [Hesperornis, wingCapability, incapable of powered flight]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wingCapability Context triple: [Hesperornis, wingCapability, incapable of powered flight]
-
A.
flightAbility
chosen
Indicates the capability or potential of an entity to fly or engage in powered or unpowered aerial movement.
-
B.
airCapability
Indicates that an entity possesses the ability or resources to operate or project power in the air (e.g., through aircraft, air defenses, or related systems).
-
C.
wingFunction
Indicates the functional role or purpose that a wing serves in enabling certain actions or capabilities.
-
D.
canFlyUsing
Indicates that an entity is capable of flying by means of, or with the assistance of, a specified method, tool, or mechanism.
-
E.
landingCapability
Indicates the ability or suitability of an entity (e.g., a vehicle or system) to perform a landing under specified conditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590ea74081908f0cd7500d85fa27 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f635a1611881908cf175d623831a42 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c1a92648190835a2c5250d8c758 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:55 p.m.