Triple
T27646217
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education |
E696718
|
entity |
| Predicate | perCuriam |
P127616
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, perCuriam, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: perCuriam Context triple: [Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, perCuriam, true]
-
A.
isPerCuriam
chosen
Indicates that a judicial opinion or decision is issued collectively by the court as a whole, without attribution to a specific judge.
-
B.
SupremeCourtHoldingRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a connection between a Supreme Court holding and another legal element, such as a case, issue, statute, or principle, to which that holding specifically relates.
-
C.
lawsuitRelatedSupremeCourtHolding
Indicates that the lawsuit is connected to, influenced by, or governed by a specific holding or decision of the Supreme Court.
-
D.
SupremeCourtVote
Indicates the voting decision or stance taken by a justice (or justices) in a case before the Supreme Court.
-
E.
concurringJustice
Indicates that a justice agrees with the court’s judgment or outcome but writes or joins a separate concurring opinion expressing different or additional reasoning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590abd3c8190834d0193bde12007 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63195d7808190a4d4bde80e99d31d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c1921008190a62675a31f66a875 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:29 p.m.