Triple
T27179631
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Crystal D. Meredith |
E683154
|
entity |
| Predicate | challengedPolicyOnBasisOf |
P1122
|
FINISHED |
| Object | use of race in student assignment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: use of race in student assignment | Statement: [Crystal D. Meredith, challengedPolicyOnBasisOf, use of race in student assignment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: challengedPolicyOnBasisOf Context triple: [Crystal D. Meredith, challengedPolicyOnBasisOf, use of race in student assignment]
-
A.
challengedStatute
Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
-
B.
challengedProcedure
Indicates that a specific procedure, method, or process has been formally questioned, disputed, or contested.
-
C.
doctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or set of beliefs is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
-
D.
constitutionalChallenge
chosen
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
E.
precedentChallenged
Indicates that an existing legal precedent is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eefad086808190ab89816c0c300476 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6257c0d58819081803213a42252b2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f620e38aec8190bb184edcdbd6da64 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:27 a.m.