Triple

T27130570
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Void (Le Vide) E681551 entity
Predicate intendedToChallenge P171761 FINISHED
Object traditional notions of art LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditional notions of art | Statement: [The Void (Le Vide), intendedToChallenge, traditional notions of art]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: intendedToChallenge
Context triple: [The Void (Le Vide), intendedToChallenge, traditional notions of art]
  • A. usedToChallenge
    Indicates that one entity was employed or relied upon by another as a means to confront, contest, or question something or someone.
  • B. challengeTo
    Indicates that one entity issues a challenge or dare for another entity to face or respond to.
  • C. hasBeenChallengedFor
    Indicates that an entity has been formally questioned, disputed, or contested specifically in relation to another entity or issue.
  • D. hasBeenChallengedIn
    Indicates that an entity has faced a challenge, contest, or dispute within a specified context, domain, or setting.
  • E. challengeUndertaken
    Indicates that an entity has accepted and is actively engaging in a specific challenge or demanding task.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eefacbcc2081909ebf00daa23f1981 completed April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a28c7c148190bfc980aad9f678ca completed May 3, 2026, 1:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69fe1e3c88190830bb2e9f407357e completed May 3, 2026, 1:07 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6a28b8ea881908733485374771c51 completed May 3, 2026, 1:19 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:04 a.m.