Triple

T2710812
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lower Canada E59854 entity
Predicate correspondsToCurrentTerritory P8402 FINISHED
Object southern Quebec LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: southern Quebec | Statement: [Lower Canada, correspondsToCurrentTerritory, southern Quebec]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: correspondsToCurrentTerritory
Context triple: [Lower Canada, correspondsToCurrentTerritory, southern Quebec]
  • A. currentTerritoryMostlyIn chosen
    Indicates that the majority of the current territorial area of one entity lies within the territorial boundaries of another entity.
  • B. definedTerritoryOf
    Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the official territorial boundaries or jurisdiction of another entity.
  • C. appliesToTerritorialEntity
    Indicates that something (such as a rule, measure, status, or attribute) is valid for, relevant to, or in effect within a specific territorial entity.
  • D. hasComponentTerritory
    Indicates that one territory is a constituent or subordinate part of a larger, encompassing territory.
  • E. territoryIncluded
    Indicates that one territory is geographically or administratively contained within another territory.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac92a088190bc74bca14038e3de completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abda78c4f08190bb1217f08198c4cc completed March 7, 2026, 7:57 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd8224c688190bb4a362360b03007 completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:55 p.m.