Triple
T26986486
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sleeping Beauty problem |
E679749
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | self-locating belief problem |
C34325
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: self-locating belief problem Context triple: [Sleeping Beauty problem, instanceOf, self-locating belief problem]
-
A.
problem in confirmation theory
chosen
A problem in confirmation theory is a conceptual challenge or paradox that questions how evidence supports, undermines, or fails to affect the rational credibility of hypotheses.
-
B.
theory of truth
A theory of truth is a conceptual framework that explains what it means for statements, beliefs, or propositions to be true and how their truth is determined or justified.
-
C.
theory of sense and reference
The theory of sense and reference is a philosophical framework, originating with Frege, that distinguishes between the meaning or mode of presentation of an expression (sense) and the actual object or truth-value it stands for (reference) to explain how language conveys information and supports rational thought.
-
D.
non-classical theory of truth
A non-classical theory of truth is an account of truth that revises or rejects classical logical principles (such as bivalence or excluded middle) to handle phenomena like vagueness, paradoxes, or semantic indeterminacy.
-
E.
philosophical theory of conditionals
A philosophical theory of conditionals is a systematic account of the meaning, truth-conditions, and logical behavior of “if–then” statements, explaining how they relate to reasoning, probability, and counterfactual situations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeeb5138ac8190b3c273ddc659a54f |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:49 a.m.