Triple
T26242418
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Questa |
E656350
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hardware design and verification software suite |
C22121
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: hardware design and verification software suite Context triple: [Questa, instanceOf, hardware design and verification software suite]
-
A.
Electronic design automation software
chosen
Electronic design automation software is a suite of specialized tools that assist engineers in designing, simulating, verifying, and optimizing electronic systems such as integrated circuits and printed circuit boards.
-
B.
hardware description language
A hardware description language is a specialized programming language used to model, design, and simulate digital electronic systems at various levels of abstraction.
-
C.
electronic design automation company
An electronic design automation company develops and provides software tools and services that enable engineers to design, simulate, verify, and optimize electronic systems and integrated circuits.
-
D.
analog integrated circuit design methodology
Analog integrated circuit design methodology is the systematic set of principles, processes, and techniques used to conceive, model, simulate, optimize, and verify analog ICs to meet specified performance, reliability, and manufacturability requirements.
-
E.
formal verification technique
A formal verification technique is a mathematically rigorous method used to prove or disprove the correctness of a system’s design or implementation with respect to a specified formal specification or property.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b4c59a881909d9ee4fd013fffd5 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 9:04 p.m.