Triple
T2618561
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 |
E58948
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusAfter2013 |
P42249
|
FINISHED |
| Object | formally on the books but coverage formula unusable |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: formally on the books but coverage formula unusable | Statement: [Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, legalStatusAfter2013, formally on the books but coverage formula unusable]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusAfter2013 Context triple: [Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, legalStatusAfter2013, formally on the books but coverage formula unusable]
-
A.
legalStatusAfter1983
Indicates the legal status or classification that an entity holds starting from the year 1983 onward.
-
B.
legalStatusAfter2009
Indicates the legal status or condition that an entity holds from the year 2009 onward, typically reflecting changes due to laws or regulations taking effect at or after that time.
-
C.
hasLegalStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
-
D.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
-
E.
legalStatusModern
Indicates the current legal standing or classification of an entity under contemporary law or regulatory frameworks.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac444dc819099614e534dd6021f |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdaca581881908fe8d3d820f839b7 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd80f48888190afdf7e3e042157d0 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abdac82b688190886a6ec2d6e2abc7 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.