Triple
T25336494
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chambourcin |
E635291
|
entity |
| Predicate | suitableForClimate |
P51066
|
FINISHED |
| Object | warm climate |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: warm climate | Statement: [Chambourcin, suitableForClimate, warm climate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: suitableForClimate Context triple: [Chambourcin, suitableForClimate, warm climate]
-
A.
designedForClimate
Indicates that something has been intentionally created or adapted to function optimally under specific climate or environmental conditions.
-
B.
preferredClimate
chosen
Indicates the type of climate that an entity favors or is most suited to.
-
C.
nativeToClimate
Indicates that an entity naturally originates from or is originally adapted to a specified climate or climatic region.
-
D.
hasClimate
Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by a particular type of climate or climatic conditions.
-
E.
hasClimateContext
Indicates that something is associated with, influenced by, or relevant to climate-related conditions, factors, or considerations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a99bd6481909476115b35b9a8e4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f497ca0f18819090168e3221c2aa32 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4683472ec8190a483b3b8afe71720 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 8:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:32 p.m.