Triple
T253219
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Religious Freedom Restoration Act |
E5195
|
entity |
| Predicate | heldUnconstitutionalAsTo |
P6915
|
FINISHED |
| Object | state and local governments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state and local governments | Statement: [Religious Freedom Restoration Act, heldUnconstitutionalAsTo, state and local governments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heldUnconstitutionalAsTo Context triple: [Religious Freedom Restoration Act, heldUnconstitutionalAsTo, state and local governments]
-
A.
section13HeldUnconstitutionalIn
chosen
Indicates that a court has determined Section 13 to be unconstitutional within a specified jurisdiction or legal context.
-
B.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
C.
upheldBy
Indicates that one entity is supported, maintained, or validated by another, often through approval, enforcement, or confirmation of its validity.
-
D.
concurringJustice
Indicates that a justice agrees with the court’s judgment or outcome but writes or joins a separate concurring opinion expressing different or additional reasoning.
-
E.
constitutionalNumber
Indicates that an entity has a specific number or count defined or constrained by a constitution or foundational governing document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257c4bf688190a46ebbf411ab7473 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25d5331b48190b3797fece8e60e20 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b678d6c81909780e1995c1ca691 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.