Triple
T25040197
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | kokotxas de merluza |
E627084
|
entity |
| Predicate | isTraditionallyCookedIn |
P61222
|
FINISHED |
| Object | earthenware casserole |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: earthenware casserole | Statement: [kokotxas de merluza, isTraditionallyCookedIn, earthenware casserole]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isTraditionallyCookedIn Context triple: [kokotxas de merluza, isTraditionallyCookedIn, earthenware casserole]
-
A.
isUsuallyCookedIn
chosen
Indicates that something is most commonly or typically prepared or cooked within a particular container, appliance, or environment.
-
B.
traditionallyServed
Indicates that one entity is customarily or conventionally presented, offered, or consumed together with another entity.
-
C.
usesCookingMethod
Indicates that one entity prepares or processes another entity by applying a specific cooking technique or method.
-
D.
foodPreparationStyle
Indicates the manner or method by which food is prepared, cooked, or processed.
-
E.
isCookedBy
Indicates that something has been prepared or made ready for eating through cooking by a particular agent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff2a2c088190be513727ee8bfe78 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f45309e63c8190bd2a221a6cd03077 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f442c861188190967655c6d8012380 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:08 a.m.