Triple
T24858187
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | El espejo de los enigmas |
E622083
|
entity |
| Predicate | tono |
P7344
|
FINISHED |
| Object | especulativo |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: especulativo | Statement: [El espejo de los enigmas, tono, especulativo]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tono Context triple: [El espejo de los enigmas, tono, especulativo]
-
A.
tonal
Indicates that one entity has a tone, pitch pattern, or tonal quality in relation to another (such as a language, sound, or musical element).
-
B.
tone
chosen
Indicates the characteristic attitude or emotional quality expressed in how something is communicated or presented.
-
C.
to
Indicates a directional or goal-oriented relationship in which something is directed, transferred, or oriented toward a target or endpoint.
-
D.
inTonality
Indicates that something (such as a musical element, passage, or piece) is expressed, structured, or interpreted within a specific musical key or tonal framework.
-
E.
tinai
Indicates a relationship where one entity is made of, composed of, or constituted by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2fac350d08190b3affde1b451a8c5 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f47b865df48190bf4b6d3e9f9305e6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4682c8a3c8190adbfaac99474eaaf |
completed | May 1, 2026, 8:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 5:21 a.m.