Triple

T24810953
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jones calculus E620785 entity
Predicate representsOpticalElementAs P161620 FINISHED
Object Jones matrix NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jones matrix | Statement: [Jones calculus, representsOpticalElementAs, Jones matrix]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: representsOpticalElementAs
Context triple: [Jones calculus, representsOpticalElementAs, Jones matrix]
  • A. hasOpticalElement
    Indicates that one entity includes, contains, or is equipped with a specific optical element as a component or part.
  • B. opticalDesign
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is responsible for creating, specifying, or defining the optical configuration or characteristics of another entity.
  • C. opticalProperty
    Indicates a relationship where an entity has or is characterized by a specific optical property, such as how it interacts with or responds to light.
  • D. usesOpticsType
    Indicates that one entity employs or is characterized by a specific type of optical system or technology.
  • E. opticalSize
    Indicates that one entity has a particular visual or perceived size relative to another, often dependent on viewing conditions or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2fabf26bc8190b191faac8f67065b completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6200ac60481909895c61d050b1338 completed May 2, 2026, 4:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f61b37a5648190b10d33ae205ccfee completed May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f61f109ef48190873bfe18638d2046 completed May 2, 2026, 3:58 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 4:50 a.m.