Triple

T24688418
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Madrid Codex E611360 entity
Predicate survivingMayaCodexAlongWith P156984 FINISHED
Object Grolier Codex NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Grolier Codex | Statement: [Madrid Codex, survivingMayaCodexAlongWith, Grolier Codex]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: survivingMayaCodexAlongWith
Context triple: [Madrid Codex, survivingMayaCodexAlongWith, Grolier Codex]
  • A. survivingMayaCodexAlongWith chosen
    Indicates that one surviving Maya codex exists together or in association with another specified surviving Maya codex.
  • B. survivesExpedition
    Indicates that an entity endures and remains alive through the duration of a specified expedition or journey.
  • C. foundInCodexWith
    Indicates that one entity is documented together with another entity within the same codex or manuscript.
  • D. survivorsJourney
    Indicates the ongoing process or path a survivor takes as they cope with, adapt to, and move forward from a traumatic or life-threatening experience.
  • E. survivesWith
    Indicates that one entity continues to live, endure, or remain viable in the presence, context, or company of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2c4d678b081908910f4271627a31a completed April 17, 2026, 11:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f44a417a58819081777e18dda149fd completed May 1, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f442a977b08190b44eac040cb90211 completed May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 3:19 a.m.