Triple
T24559445
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Agra gharana |
E607610
|
entity |
| Predicate | talaEmphasis |
P17414
|
FINISHED |
| Object | teentaal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: teentaal | Statement: [Agra gharana, talaEmphasis, teentaal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: talaEmphasis Context triple: [Agra gharana, talaEmphasis, teentaal]
-
A.
hasEmphasis
chosen
Indicates that one element is given special stress, importance, or prominence relative to others.
-
B.
positionEmphasized
Indicates that a particular position, stance, or role is given special prominence or stress relative to others.
-
C.
emphasizesConsonanceOf
Indicates that one entity highlights, stresses, or draws attention to the harmony, agreement, or consonant relationship between itself and another entity.
-
D.
closingEmphasis
Indicates that one entity concludes or reinforces another entity’s point, action, or message with particular stress or importance.
-
E.
nicknameEmphasizes
Indicates that a nickname highlights or draws special attention to a particular characteristic, trait, or aspect of the entity it refers to.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2c4cae1b88190825e88d5ce8aa61e |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2a8f4af6481908576473adab9f6bf |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f2a6b99e7c8190ba7e2dc8729a314a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:27 a.m.