Triple
T24413959
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grolier Codex |
E615530
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesPigment |
P109796
|
FINISHED |
| Object | black pigment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: black pigment | Statement: [Grolier Codex, usesPigment, black pigment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesPigment Context triple: [Grolier Codex, usesPigment, black pigment]
-
A.
hasPigment
chosen
Indicates that one entity contains, incorporates, or is characterized by a particular pigment.
-
B.
usesDyes
Indicates that one entity employs or applies dyes in relation to another entity or process.
-
C.
primaryPigment
Indicates that one pigment is the main or dominant colorant used or present in relation to another entity.
-
D.
secondaryPigment
Indicates that one pigment functions as a secondary or supporting color relative to another primary pigment in a given context.
-
E.
colorTincture
Indicates that one entity has a specific heraldic color or tincture applied to it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7e9bfac8190a748952a90957106 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2958302ec8190bf32409a5ca00ebf |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287cc4fd4819081e93cc638d9512d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:12 a.m.