Triple

T24395240
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Crowell v. Benson E615010 entity
Predicate holding P2237 FINISHED
Object The use of administrative agencies for initial adjudication does not necessarily violate Article III if adequate judicial review is preserved. — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (1 step)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The use of administrative agencies for initial adjudication does not necessarily violate Article III if adequate judicial review is preserved. | Statement: [Crowell v. Benson, holding, The use of administrative agencies for initial adjudication does not necessarily violate Article III if adequate judicial review is preserved.]

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2d7e509b88190a53155d4f3de45ce completed April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f294d69b5c81908cf6143374934f5c completed April 29, 2026, 11:31 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:04 a.m.