Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. | Statement: [Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, landmarkCase, Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.]

Target entity: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.
Context triple: [Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, landmarkCase, Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.]

• A. De Canas v. Bica
  De Canas v. Bica is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a California law regulating the employment of unauthorized immigrants, holding that not all state regulations touching on immigration are preempted by federal law.
• B. Saenz v. Roe
  Saenz v. Roe is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down California’s welfare residency requirements and reaffirmed the constitutional right to travel under the Fourteenth Amendment.
• C. Corfield v. Coryell
  Corfield v. Coryell is an 1823 federal circuit court decision by Justice Bushrod Washington that famously articulated an influential early list of the fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause.
• D. Ware v. Hylton
  Ware v. Hylton was a 1796 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal treaties override conflicting state laws, helping to establish the authority of the national government under the Constitution.
• E. Briggs v. Elliott
  Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.
Triple: [Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, landmarkCase, Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.]

Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held same-sex workplace harassment is actionable under Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination.

Target entity: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.
Target entity description: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held same-sex workplace harassment is actionable under Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination.

• A. De Canas v. Bica
  De Canas v. Bica is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a California law regulating the employment of unauthorized immigrants, holding that not all state regulations touching on immigration are preempted by federal law.
• B. Saenz v. Roe
  Saenz v. Roe is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down California’s welfare residency requirements and reaffirmed the constitutional right to travel under the Fourteenth Amendment.
• C. Corfield v. Coryell
  Corfield v. Coryell is an 1823 federal circuit court decision by Justice Bushrod Washington that famously articulated an influential early list of the fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause.
• D. Ware v. Hylton
  Ware v. Hylton was a 1796 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal treaties override conflicting state laws, helping to establish the authority of the national government under the Constitution.
• E. Briggs v. Elliott
  Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
• F. None of above. chosen