Triple
T24313716
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Shapley–Gale theorem |
E612745
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | result in cooperative game theory |
C48681
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: result in cooperative game theory Context triple: [Shapley–Gale theorem, instanceOf, result in cooperative game theory]
-
A.
cooperative game
A cooperative game is a strategic situation in which players can form binding agreements and coalitions to share payoffs and work together to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.
-
B.
result in combinatorial game theory
In combinatorial game theory, a result is a formal outcome or conclusion—such as a theorem, lemma, or classification—that characterizes the behavior, value, or winning conditions of one or more games under specified rules.
-
C.
bargaining solution concept
A bargaining solution concept is a formal rule or principle that specifies how two or more parties should divide the benefits of cooperation given their feasible payoffs and disagreement outcomes.
-
D.
game-theoretic scenario
A game-theoretic scenario is a structured situation in which multiple decision-makers (players) with potentially conflicting interests choose strategies whose outcomes and payoffs depend on the combined actions of all participants.
-
E.
result in social choice theory
A result in social choice theory is a formal theorem or proposition that characterizes how individual preferences can be aggregated into a collective decision under specified axioms or conditions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7da491c8190b6e6218af50923db |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 1:45 a.m.