Triple

T23923340
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Svalbard reindeer E602277 entity
Predicate historicalThreats P14802 FINISHED
Object overhunting in the early 20th century LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: overhunting in the early 20th century | Statement: [Svalbard reindeer, historicalThreats, overhunting in the early 20th century]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalThreats
Context triple: [Svalbard reindeer, historicalThreats, overhunting in the early 20th century]
  • A. historicalThreat chosen
    Indicates that one entity posed a significant threat to another in the past, but is not necessarily a current or ongoing danger.
  • B. hasThreats
    Indicates that one entity poses or is associated with potential danger, harm, or adverse consequences toward another entity.
  • C. laterThreat
    Indicates that one entity poses a threat to another at a time subsequent to some referenced or initial point.
  • D. targetsThreat
    Indicates that one entity is directing an action or focus specifically toward a perceived threat.
  • E. threatsFaced
    Indicates that an entity is exposed to or experiences specific dangers, risks, or harmful conditions.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2953b928c819095395fa87baca583 completed April 17, 2026, 8:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1cf1abd148190a8393418ed965019 completed April 29, 2026, 9:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f16151ebdc819086e9e1d7cc1f4f3c completed April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:41 p.m.