Triple

T23634092
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sapphire E583692 entity
Predicate differsFromRubyBy P61682 FINISHED
Object color definition within corundum group LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: color definition within corundum group | Statement: [Sapphire, differsFromRubyBy, color definition within corundum group]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: differsFromRubyBy
Context triple: [Sapphire, differsFromRubyBy, color definition within corundum group]
  • A. isInterpretedDifferentlyIn
    Indicates that the same item, event, or expression is understood or construed in a different way within a specified context, group, or setting.
  • B. differIn chosen
    Indicates that two entities are not the same in at least one specified aspect, attribute, or value.
  • C. mayDifferFrom
    Indicates that one entity is allowed or expected to be different from another entity, without requiring them to be identical.
  • D. isDistinctFrom
    Indicates that two entities are not identical and can be clearly distinguished from one another.
  • E. hasLexicalDifferencesWith
    Indicates that two linguistic items differ from each other in their word choice or lexical form.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e248fe1c2c8190ac914d2442ff3d26 completed April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1b1eb38a481909f7ceeaefb7b43ce completed April 29, 2026, 7:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f118d0e0588190a86527a7747c5427 completed April 28, 2026, 8:30 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:47 p.m.