Triple
T23599979
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States |
E582723
|
entity |
| Predicate | decidedUnderChiefJustice |
P6504
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Earl Warren |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Earl Warren | Statement: [Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States, decidedUnderChiefJustice, Earl Warren]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: decidedUnderChiefJustice Context triple: [Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States, decidedUnderChiefJustice, Earl Warren]
-
A.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
chosen
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
B.
chiefJustice
Indicates that one entity serves as the chief justice (the highest-ranking judicial officer) of another entity, such as a court or jurisdiction.
-
C.
chiefJusticePresiding
Indicates that a specified chief justice is the one formally presiding over a particular court session, case, or judicial proceeding.
-
D.
chiefJusticeAppointedBy
Indicates that a particular chief justice is selected and formally given their position by a specified appointing authority.
-
E.
hasChiefJusticeAuthor
Indicates that the chief justice is the author of the referenced work, decision, or document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e248faa2788190abb1581742daa6aa |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b0929c548190bb42621d1131d87f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118c96a0081908a8ac98ef7e7e60c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:43 p.m.