Triple
T23541499
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | law of accelerating returns |
E577762
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | concept in technological singularity studies |
C906
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: concept in technological singularity studies Context triple: [law of accelerating returns, instanceOf, concept in technological singularity studies]
-
A.
technology concept
chosen
A technology concept is an abstract idea or blueprint that outlines how a particular technological solution, system, or innovation could function to address a specific need or problem.
-
B.
concept in philosophy of technology
A concept in the philosophy of technology is an abstract idea or theoretical construct used to analyze, interpret, and critique the nature, development, and impact of technologies on human life and society.
-
C.
transhumanist
A transhumanist is someone who advocates using advanced technology to enhance human physical and cognitive abilities, ultimately aiming to transcend current biological limitations.
-
D.
concept in science and technology studies
A concept in science and technology studies is an abstract analytical tool used to understand, interpret, and critique the social, cultural, political, and material dimensions of scientific knowledge and technological systems.
-
E.
visionary computing idea
A visionary computing idea is a forward-looking conceptual innovation that reimagines how computation could fundamentally operate, interact with humans, or transform society beyond current technological limits.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245f9d5d08190a4a20004e1784e20 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:10 p.m.