Triple
T23489484
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India |
E570629
|
entity |
| Predicate | judicialHoldingInLandmarkCase |
P107431
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Speaker’s decision under the Tenth Schedule is subject to judicial review |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Speaker’s decision under the Tenth Schedule is subject to judicial review | Statement: [Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India, judicialHoldingInLandmarkCase, Speaker’s decision under the Tenth Schedule is subject to judicial review]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judicialHoldingInLandmarkCase Context triple: [Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India, judicialHoldingInLandmarkCase, Speaker’s decision under the Tenth Schedule is subject to judicial review]
-
A.
judgeInLandmarkCase
Indicates that a person served as a judge in a court case recognized as historically or legally significant.
-
B.
landmarkCase
Indicates that a legal case is historically significant or precedent-setting within a legal system.
-
C.
leadingJudgmentBy
Indicates a relationship where one judgment or legal decision is treated as the primary or authoritative basis guiding or influencing another judgment.
-
D.
judgmentInvolves
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
E.
judicialFinding
chosen
Indicates a formal determination or conclusion reached by a judicial authority regarding facts, law, or liability in a legal matter.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b0b01481908f636939bedd804c |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a7dae8cc8190bf74d1bdb0fc6c60 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f0620ac3608190b36916261ea50f54 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:04 p.m.