Triple
T23387513
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PUA-A |
E593923
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRecommendedUseNote |
P24534
|
FINISHED |
| Object | interchange only by prior agreement between parties |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: interchange only by prior agreement between parties | Statement: [PUA-A, hasRecommendedUseNote, interchange only by prior agreement between parties]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRecommendedUseNote Context triple: [PUA-A, hasRecommendedUseNote, interchange only by prior agreement between parties]
-
A.
hasUsageNote
chosen
Indicates that there is an associated explanatory note describing how or when something should be used.
-
B.
recommendsUseOf
Indicates that one entity advises, endorses, or suggests the use of another entity as appropriate or beneficial in a given context.
-
C.
implementsRecommendationOf
Indicates that one entity carries out or puts into practice a recommendation that was proposed or issued by another entity.
-
D.
notRecommendedBy
Indicates that one entity explicitly advises against or does not endorse another entity.
-
E.
isOftenRecommendedBy
Indicates that one entity is frequently suggested or endorsed by another as a preferred or suitable choice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d2754fc819085deea939bde60ab |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a498fd08819085e90a872d9d0c7a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f061dde2e481908308952f9c0d3c2e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:35 p.m.