Triple
T23378603
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Labouchere Amendment |
E593675
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | provision of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885 |
C47598
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: provision of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885 Context triple: [Labouchere Amendment, instanceOf, provision of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885]
-
A.
criminal code
A criminal code is a systematic collection of laws that define criminal offenses, prescribe penalties, and establish rules for prosecution and punishment within a jurisdiction.
-
B.
Indian criminal law
Indian criminal law is the body of legal rules, primarily codified in statutes like the Indian Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure, that defines criminal offenses, prescribes punishments, and regulates the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of crimes in India.
-
C.
criminal syndicalism law
A criminal syndicalism law is a statute that criminalizes advocacy, organization, or participation in movements that promote crime, violence, or sabotage as a means of achieving political or industrial change.
-
D.
convicted criminal
A convicted criminal is an individual who has been found guilty of committing a crime through a formal legal process and has received a corresponding judgment or sentence.
-
E.
criminal law principle
A criminal law principle is a foundational rule or doctrine that guides the definition of crimes, the attribution of liability, and the imposition of punishment within a criminal justice system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d268a50819095f2fd479da8ef3f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:33 p.m.