Triple

T23347147
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject buckminsterfullerene E591897 entity
Predicate canFormCation P118639 FINISHED
Object C60+ LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: C60+ | Statement: [buckminsterfullerene, canFormCation, C60+]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canFormCation
Context triple: [buckminsterfullerene, canFormCation, C60+]
  • A. hasCation chosen
    Indicates that something contains, is associated with, or involves a positively charged ion (cation) in its composition or structure.
  • B. hasAnion
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with another entity functioning as its anion (negatively charged ion).
  • C. hasFormalOxidationStateOfMetal
    Indicates that a metal entity is assigned a specific formal oxidation state in a chemical context.
  • D. cannotForm
    Indicates that one entity is unable or not permitted to establish, create, or constitute a specified relationship, structure, or configuration with another entity.
  • E. canTakeForm
    Indicates that one entity is capable of assuming, transforming into, or being represented as the form or appearance of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d20e3d08190bcede87673cafb25 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f19837874481908f1a530261a34819 completed April 29, 2026, 5:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69effcfd8d288190937a887fe6023c11 completed April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:19 p.m.